<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>www.ramonddevrede.nl &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/en/category/beveiliging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ramonddevrede.nl</link>
	<description>Information &#38; Communication Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:20:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to re-activate Office 2010 Technical Preview</title>
		<link>http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/en/how-to-re-activation-office-2010-technical-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/en/how-to-re-activation-office-2010-technical-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rdevrede</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several people who installed the Technical Preview of Microsoft Office 2010 noticed after 30 days activation will not succeed. This is related to the fact the activation servers of Office 2010 not yet are published via DNS, simply explained to the fact they don&#8217;t exist yet. How you can re-activate for another 30 days? I give [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several people who installed the Technical Preview of Microsoft Office 2010 noticed after 30 days activation will not succeed. This is related to the fact the activation servers of Office 2010 not yet are published via DNS, simply explained to the fact they don&#8217;t exist yet. How you can re-activate for another 30 days? I give you a brief procedure how to do it :</p>
<p>First you have to stop the service : Office Software Protection</p>
<p>Then run x:\Windows\System32\OSPPRUN.exe (x can be your C: or other driveletter you have installed windows on)</p>
<p>You will have a prompt.</p>
<p>Enter these command followed by an enter like shown below, go to next step</p>
<p>&gt;Initialize (enter)</p>
<p>&gt;Open (enter)</p>
<p>&gt;GetInstalledSkuIds (enter)</p>
<p>   0. 128a057a-7e95-4063-b296-c54c5f3d3f3a (deze is het ID van Office 2010)</p>
<p>   1. 26adec89-edf3-4adc-a3fc-c865f1a9f71f</p>
<p>OK.</p>
<p>&gt; GetInstalledAppIds 128a057a-7e95-4063-b296-c54c5f3d3f3a (enter)</p>
<p>   0. 59a52881-a989-479d-af46-f275c6370663</p>
<p>OK.</p>
<p>(You will get something that looks like this)</p>
<p>&gt; GetLicensingStatus 59a52881-a989-479d-af46-f275c6370663 128a057a-7e95-4063-b296-c54c5f3d3f3a (enter)</p>
<p>SkuId            = 128a057a-7e95-4063-b296-c54c5f3d3f3a</p>
<p>eStatus          = SL_LICENSING_STATUS_IN_GRACE_PERIOD</p>
<p>dwGraceTime      = 1D 23:37</p>
<p>dwTotalGraceDays = 30 days</p>
<p>hrReason         = 4004F00C</p>
<p>qwExpiration     = 2010/10/31</p>
<p>OK.</p>
<p>(What you are now going to do is set AppID and SkuID for Office 2010 to enable again 30 days before activation. That gives you another 30 days to test. Mostly the IDs are the same, if not please copy and use yours</p>
<p>&gt; Rearm 59a52881-a989-479d-af46-f275c6370663 128a057a-7e95-4063-b296-c54c5f3d3f3a 1 (enter)</p>
<p>OK.</p>
<p>&gt;close (enter)</p>
<p>&gt;Initialize (enter)</p>
<p>&gt;open (enter)</p>
<p>You can enter the command below to check out how many days you have left (See dwGraceTime): </p>
<p>&gt; GetLicensingStatus 59a52881-a989-479d-af46-f275c6370663 128a057a-7e95-4063-b296-c54c5f3d3f3a (enter)</p>
<p>SkuId            = 128a057a-7e95-4063-b296-c54c5f3d3f3a</p>
<p>eStatus          = SL_LICENSING_STATUS_IN_GRACE_PERIOD</p>
<p>dwGraceTime      = 29D 23:37</p>
<p>dwTotalGraceDays = 30 days</p>
<p>hrReason         = 4004F00C</p>
<p>qwExpiration     = 2010/10/31</p>
<p>&gt;quit (enter)</p>
<p>You are able to use it again for 30 days. Have a lot of fun with testing Microsoft Office 2010&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/en/how-to-re-activation-office-2010-technical-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In 2008 Windows had less found exploits</title>
		<link>http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/en/in-2008-had-windows-minder-lekken/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/en/in-2008-had-windows-minder-lekken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rdevrede</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lekken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2008 Windows operating systems less exploit/leaks were found than in other systems as Linux and Mac OS X.
Before I have indicated that it&#8217;s not so bad with the insecurity of Windows than some would like to believe us.  It appears that exploits in Linux or Mac OS X are more awful or just awful. 
Now X-Force did a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2008 Windows operating systems less exploit/leaks were found than in other systems as Linux and Mac OS X.</p>
<p>Before I have indicated that it&#8217;s not so bad with the insecurity of Windows than some would like to believe us.  It appears that exploits in Linux or Mac OS X are more awful or just awful. </p>
<p>Now X-Force did a research and came to the following conclusion: </p>
<p>Apple Mac OS X had more than 14% of the leaks.  Linux had more than 10% of the leaks. </p>
<p>Amusingly is also that Windows XP (5,5%) comes on the 5th spot and unsafer is than Windows Vista (5,1%).  I did not expected otherwise because Microsoft do well know what they should do.  You can read the original article on:  <a href="http://www.zdnet.nl/news.cfm?id=97972&amp;mxp=221">http://www.zdnet.nl/news.cfm?id=97972&amp;mxp=221</a></p>
<p>You can see it&#8217;s not easy to claim a safe operating system because a lot of time the least secure are saying Windows is unsecure.</p>
<p>It is commonly known exploits are normal in operating systems. </p>
<p>You have to install more patches under Linux or Mac OS X than by Windows operating system. This saves again money for maintenance for businesses which use Windows as operating system, yet to be silent about  the safety risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/en/in-2008-had-windows-minder-lekken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
