<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>www.ramonddevrede.nl &#187; mac os x</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/tag/mac-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ramonddevrede.nl</link>
	<description>Information &#38; Communication Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In 2008 Windows had less found exploits</title>
		<link>http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/en/in-2008-had-windows-minder-lekken/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/en/in-2008-had-windows-minder-lekken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rdevrede</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lekken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2008 Windows operating systems less exploit/leaks were found than in other systems as Linux and Mac OS X. Before I have indicated that it&#8217;s not so bad with the insecurity of Windows than some would like to believe us.  It appears that exploits in Linux or Mac OS X are more awful or just awful.  Now X-Force [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2008 Windows operating systems less exploit/leaks were found than in other systems as Linux and Mac OS X.</p>
<p>Before I have indicated that it&#8217;s not so bad with the insecurity of Windows than some would like to believe us.  It appears that exploits in Linux or Mac OS X are more awful or just awful. </p>
<p>Now X-Force did a research and came to the following conclusion: </p>
<p>Apple Mac OS X had more than 14% of the leaks.  Linux had more than 10% of the leaks. </p>
<p>Amusingly is also that Windows XP (5,5%) comes on the 5th spot and unsafer is than Windows Vista (5,1%).  I did not expected otherwise because Microsoft do well know what they should do.  You can read the original article on:  <a href="http://www.zdnet.nl/news.cfm?id=97972&amp;mxp=221">http://www.zdnet.nl/news.cfm?id=97972&amp;mxp=221</a></p>
<p>You can see it&#8217;s not easy to claim a safe operating system because a lot of time the least secure are saying Windows is unsecure.</p>
<p>It is commonly known exploits are normal in operating systems. </p>
<p>You have to install more patches under Linux or Mac OS X than by Windows operating system. This saves again money for maintenance for businesses which use Windows as operating system, yet to be silent about  the safety risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ramonddevrede.nl/en/in-2008-had-windows-minder-lekken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

